SATA and eSATA Performance

Website: HD Tach 3.0
We tested the SATA and eSATA performance with an Intel X25-M SSD to maximise the use of the SATA connections to show up any core differences in raw performance.

SATA Performance

  • Foxconn Blood Rage
  • Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
  • Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
  • Asus P6T Deluxe
  • MSI Eclipse SLI
  • Asus Rampage II Gene
  • 218.0
  • 217.2
  • 217.1
  • 194.5
  • 191.4
  • 190.7
0
50
100
150
200
MB/s (higher is better)

eSATA Performance

  • Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P (Gigabyte JMicron)
  • Asus Rampage II Gene (JMicron JMB363)
  • Foxconn Blood Rage (JMicron JMB363)
  • Asus P6T Deluxe (Marvell 88SE6111-NAA1)
  • MSI Eclipse SLI (JMicron JMB362)
  • 217.1
  • 167.3
  • 162.4
  • 159.8
  • 117.6
0
50
100
150
200
MB/s (higher is better)

The SATA performance is similar to the P6T, and while quite fast doesn't maxmise the performance available from a high end device like our Intel X25-M SSD by nearly 20MB/sec. The extra SATA/eSATA performance is not too bad though, as far as JMicron chipsets go we saw worse on the Maximus II Gene, however Asus still manages to offer quite a bit of bandwidth.

USB 2.0 Performance

Website: HD Tach 3.0
We tested the USB performance with an Intel X25-M SSD and a SATA to USB adapter to saturate the USB bus in order to look for any performance drops.

USB 2.0 Performance

  • Asus Rampage II Gene
  • Foxconn Blood Rage
  • Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P
  • Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
  • MSI Eclipse SLI
  • Asus P6T Deluxe
  • 34.9
  • 34.9
  • 34.9
  • 34.9
  • 34.9
  • 34.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
MB/s (higher is better)

The USB performance is consistent to other ICH10R southbridge boards tested.
Discuss this in the forums
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.